For decades people wishing to organize in more cooperative ways have been encouraged to make decisions by consensus, and for good reason: when it works well, it's awesome. However—when it doesn't work—it can lead to personal guilt, frustration; organizational paralysis or disintegration.

What should we do when consensus can't be reached? What if cooperative decision-making is better achieved in such cases with practices other than "reaching consensus"? In this talk I will explore how score voting with tweaks can provide a simple, scalable and systematically cooperative alternative to the often utopian ideal of consensus.

Please note, due to space this event is limited to only 15 people. If you aren't able to come, please cancel your ticket so someone else is able to attend.